首页> 外文OA文献 >Leadership = Communication? The relations of leaders' communication styles with leadership styles, knowledge sharing and leadership outcomes
【2h】

Leadership = Communication? The relations of leaders' communication styles with leadership styles, knowledge sharing and leadership outcomes

机译:领导=沟通?领导者的沟通方式与领导方式,知识共享和领导成果的关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relations between leaders' communication styles and charismatic leadership, human-oriented leadership (leader's consideration), task-oriented leadership (leader's initiating structure), and leadership outcomes. Methodology: A survey was conducted among 279 employees of a governmental organization. The following six main communication styles were operationalized: verbal aggressiveness, expressiveness, preciseness, assuredness, supportiveness, and argumentativeness. Regression analyses were employed to test three main hypotheses. Findings: In line with expectations, the study showed that charismatic and human-oriented leadership are mainly communicative, while task-oriented leadership is significantly less communicative. The communication styles were strongly and differentially related to knowledge sharing behaviors, perceived leader performance, satisfaction with the leader, and subordinate's team commitment. Multiple regression analyses showed that the leadership styles mediated the relations between the communication styles and leadership outcomes. However, leader's preciseness explained variance in perceived leader performance and satisfaction with the leader above and beyond the leadership style variables. Implications: This study offers potentially invaluable input for leadership training programs by showing the importance of leader's supportiveness, assuredness, and preciseness when communicating with subordinates. Originality/value: Although one of the core elements of leadership is interpersonal communication, this study is one of the first to use a comprehensive communication styles instrument in the study of leadership. © 2009 The Author(s).
机译:目的:本研究的目的是研究领导者的沟通方式与超凡领导力,以人为本的领导力(领导者的考虑),以任务为导向的领导力(领导者的发起结构)和领导力结果之间的关系。方法:对一个政府组织的279名员工进行了调查。以下六种主要的沟通方式得以实施:言语进取,表现力,精确性,放心,支持性和论证性。回归分析用于检验三个主要假设。结果:与预期一致,研究表明,具有超凡魅力和以人为本的领导力主要是沟通能力,而以任务为导向的领导力则很少沟通。沟通方式与知识共享行为,感知的领导者表现,对领导者的满意度以及下属的团队承诺密切相关且有区别。多元回归分析表明,领导风格介导了沟通风格与领导成果之间的关系。但是,领导者的精确度解释了领导者表现的差异以及领导者风格变量之外对领导者的满意度。启示:这项研究通过展示领导者与下属沟通时的支持,保证和精确性的重要性,为领导力培训计划提供了潜在的宝贵信息。原创性/价值:尽管领导力的核心要素之一是人际交往,但这项研究是在领导力研究中首次使用全面的交际风格工具之一。 ©2009作者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号